SPG Ratings China /insights/articles/2020-6-1-affiliated-financial-leasing-companies_en content esgSubNav
评级报告

Group Support Sustains Credit Quality of Bank-affiliated Leasing Companies in China

评级报告:义乌市城市投资建设集团有限公司,2025年8月29日

评级报告:珠海水务环境控股集团有限公司,2025年8月29日

评级报告:科学城(广州)投资集团有限公司,2025年8月28日

专项债支付垫付建设成本,为 PPP 项目回款带来曙光


Group Support Sustains Credit Quality of Bank-affiliated Leasing Companies in China

Although the COVID-19 pandemic has negative impact on asset quality and profitability of bank-affiliated leasing companies in China, we expect them to maintain stable credit quality thanks to strong support from parent banks and ultimately the government. We believe the sharp revenue shock to financial leasing companies with large exposures to the aviation industry is controllable at the banking group level. 
Significant pressure is felt on the asset quality of the companies’ aircraft fleets. Distressed cash flows of the aviation industry are hurting the rental revenue of leasing companies in ways of deferrals of lease rentals, possible bankruptcy and return of aircrafts by airlines, restructuring of leases, and lower lease rates in a weak market. As COVID-19 keeps aircrafts on the ground around the world, airlines are forced to request for deferrals in lease payment and a few airlines outside China have filed for bankruptcy. After repossession of aircrafts from a bankrupt airline, revenue will probably be lost as lessors hold on idle aircrafts and try to find new lessees. A silver lining is that, if a bankrupt airline can be reorganized, there is a good chance of the reorganized airlines keeping the leased aircrafts, saving leasing companies the trouble of releasing repossessed aircrafts.
In addition, as the leasing market suffers from low demand, lease rates are likely to fall for repossessed aircrafts and those with leases expiring in 2020 or 2021. If the pandemic has a lasting influence on the market valuation of aircrafts, aircraft portfolios may be under further pressure.
In our opinion, the potential extent of aviation industry -related loss is subject to the development of the pandemic and governments’ support to the aviation industry. Given the global nature of aircraft leasing and leasing companies’ exposure to international airlines, Chinese financial leasing companies are also facing uncertainty in foreign governments’ support to their respective aviation industries.
Although large bank-affiliated leasing companies typically have significant exposure to the aviation industry, the contribution of aircraft fleets to parent banks’ total assets is typically small. Therefore, we believe the increase of risk related to aircraft assets is controllable at the group level. The exposure to the aviation industry mainly concentrates in top leasing companies affiliated with China’s top banks. The high creditworthiness of the parent banks mitigates the sharp shock caused by the pandemic, in our view.

In addition to aviation leasing, financial leasing portfolios are also under asset quality pressure. In our view, financial leasing asset portfolios have a risk profile similar to the corporate loan portfolios of banks, with exposure typically concentrating in manufacturing, infrastructure and utilities sectors within China. 
We believe bad debt pressure of financial leasing portfolios is mitigated by governments’ likely support to local government financing vehicles (LGFVs) and businesses in general. In addition, the highly overlapping client bases of banks and their leasing companies lead to positive synergy in risk management and mitigation. 

We anticipate the parent banks’ incentive and capability to support their leasing subsidiaries to remain stable. We consider the leasing business as integral to their banking groups’ strategy to be comprehensive providers of financial products and services. We believe China’s banking sector will remain stable thanks to strong government support (see “Government Support Mitigates COVID-19's Pressure On Chinese Banks’ Creditworthiness”, published on May 20, 2020). Chinese regulation requires parent banks to ensure capital adequacy and liquidity sufficiency of their affiliated leasing companies in times of need. 
We believe any government support to the banks will also flow to their leasing subsidiaries. Financial leasing companies’ forbearance measures for aviation and other hard-hit industries are consistent with government policy of having financial institutions help the real economy through the hard time. As the government prioritizes financial stability in this special period, we expect its incentive to support banks and their affiliated leasing companies to be strong. 
We expect the business growth of the financial leasing companies to be slower because aircraft leasing had been an important growing sector before the pandemic and aircraft leasing will probably not see any growth in 2020. Nevertheless, there are other business opportunities related to government-led infrastructure development.  
Despite the earnings pressure, we expect the companies’ capital level to remain adequate as their parent banks are required by regulation to replenish their capital when necessary. In addition, bank-affiliated leasing companies typically had adequate capital before the pandemic thanks to strong capital injection from parents and good earning capability. In addition, slower growth of operating leases is also likely to reduce capital consumption in 2020. 

We expect the funding and liquidity profiles of the bank-affiliated leasing companies to remain stable thanks to the ample systemwide liquidity in the inter-bank market and strong liquidity positions of their parent banks. Regulation requires the parent banks to provide liquidity support to their leasing subsidiaries. Due to the forbearance measures given to airlines and other hard-hit customers, the cash inflow of rental payment is reduced. Meanwhile, we expect their cash outflow related to capital spending to be lower than originally planned as aircraft delivery will probably be very few this year. 
Our stable outlook for the banking sector and bank-affiliated leasing companies in China is based on our economic forecast of a U-shape recovery in 2020 and 2021. We acknowledge a high degree of uncertainty about the economic recovery from the COVID-19 outbreak for both China and other countries. As the situation evolves, we will update our assumptions and estimates accordingly.

This report does not constitute a rating action.



评级报告:义乌市城市投资建设集团有限公司,2025年8月29日

2025年8月29日,标普信评发布了关于义乌市城市投资建设集团有限公司的主体评级报告。
点击下方按钮获取完整版报告。
<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>


评级报告:珠海水务环境控股集团有限公司,2025年8月29日

2025年8月29日,标普信评发布了关于珠海水务环境控股集团有限公司的主体评级报告。

点击下方按钮获取完整版报告。
<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>


评级报告:科学城(广州)投资集团有限公司,2025年8月28日

2025年8月28日,标普信评发布了关于科学城(广州)投资集团有限公司的主体评级报告。

点击下方按钮获取完整版报告。
<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>


专项债支付垫付建设成本,为 PPP 项目回款带来曙光

标普信评认为,《关于规范政府和社会资本合作存量项目的建设和运营的指导意见》(以下简称 “84 号文”)的出台有助于存量在建 PPP 项目建设进度的推进和已运营 PPP 项目顺利回款。84号文强调政府依法履约按效付费,并引入专项债解决社会资本方垫付的建设成本问题,社会资本方的垫资及回款拖欠的问题有望得到解决,缓解了其现金流压力,也有助于恢复社会资本方对 PPP 模式的信心

点击下方按钮获取完整版报告。

<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>