BEIJING, July 27, 2021 - S&P Global (China) Ratings has assigned its AAA_spc rating to Bank of China Limited (“BOC”), and the outlook is stable. In addition, S&P Global (China) Ratings has assigned its AAA_spc rating to BOC’s 2021 Financial Bonds (Series 2).

We assess BOC’s stand-alone credit profile (“SACP”) as “aa_spc”, five notches higher than the “bbb+” anchor we typically apply to a commercial bank in China. This reflects BOC’s status as China’s fourth largest commercial bank by asset size and its very strong franchise in the Chinese Mainland and Hong Kong, which makes the bank more internationally diversified. Meanwhile, its large and sticky deposit bases in China makes its funding and liquidity profile very strong. In general, we believe “aa_spc” is the highest SACP that commercial banks could reach in S&P Global (China) Ratings.

The issuer credit rating (“ICR”) of “AAA_spc” incorporates a two-notch uplift from our assessment of its SACP of “aa_spc”, reflecting the extremely high likelihood of central government support in times of stress.

BOC is the fourth-largest commercial bank in China. As of the end of 2020, it represented 9.7% and 7.7% of the commercial bank market share of loans and deposits in China, respectively. Compared to other mega banks, BOC is more internationally diversified. Besides the Chinese mainland, it operated in 61 countries and regions as of the end of 2020. Compared to its peers, the bank has a leading position in cross-border custodian business, panda bond and off-shore bond underwriting, foreign exchange trading and cross-border RMB settlement.

BOC has a very stable funding structure thanks to its large and sticky corporate and retail deposit bases in China. As of the end of 2020, 76% of its liabilities were customer deposits, and 45% of its deposits were retail deposits. It also benefits from “flight to quality” when market liquidity tightens.

We expect BOC`s capital adequacy to remain adequate. As of the end of 2020, its reported regulatory tier-1 capital adequacy ratio was 13.19%. We expect BOC to increase its capitalization as it is a globally systemically important bank (“G-SIB”) and subject to TLAC requirements.

BOC’s asset quality has remained stable during the pandemic. Its average non-performing loan (“NPL”) ratio from 2018 to 2020 was 1.42%, consistent with the mega bank weighted average and 43 bps lower than the industry average. The asset quality performance of BOC's portfolio outside the Chinese mainland, particularly its Hong Kong portfolio, is better than its domestic loan book. As of the end of 2020, its loans outside the Chinese mainland accounted for 19% of its gross loans and the impaired loan ratio was 0.64%, much lower than BOC’s overall impaired loan ratio of 1.46%.

In our opinion, as the fourth largest commercial bank in China by asset size, BOC is of critical importance to the central government for its role in maintaining the country’s financial stability. BOC is of critical importance to the government in its execution of major economic and financial policy initiatives. As of the end of 2020, the central government held about 64% of the bank’s shares through Central Huijin Investment Ltd.

We have equalized the credit rating of Bank of China Limited Financial Bonds (Series 2) with the issuer credit rating on BOC since it is senior unsecured debt of the bank. The principal amount of this bond is RMB 30 billion and it has a 3-year term. The repayment sequence of the bond`s principal and interest are equal to the general liabilities of commercial banks.

Issuer Credit Rating Snapshot：

Anchor：bbb+

    Business Position：+3

    Capital and Earnings：0

    Risk Position：0

    Funding and Liquidity：+2

Stand-alone Credit Profile：aa_spc

Government Support：+2

Issuer Credit Rating：AAA_spc

Outlook/CreditWatch：Stable

Related Research & Commentary:

Credit Rating Report: Bank of China Limited, July 15, 2021.

Issue Rating Notice: Bank of China Limited 2021 Financial Bonds (Series 2) Rated “AAA_spc”, July 15, 2021.

Related Methodology:

S&P Global (China) Ratings Financial Institutions Methodology.

General Considerations on Rating Modifiers And Relative Ranking.

Media Contacts：

Sharon Tang, Beijing, (86)10-6569-2988; sharon.tang@spgchinaratings.cn

Analyst Contacts:

Longtai Chen，Beijing；longtai.chen@spgchinaratings.cn

Xiaochen Luan, CFA， FRM, Beijing; collins.luan@spgchinaratings.cn

Zheng Li, FRM, Beijing; zheng.li@spgchinaratings.cn

• 绿色金融的概念是动态发展的，其支持范围已从传统的环保产业活动扩展到传统高碳行业的低碳转型活动，并逐步形成了以可持续发展为核心的理念体系。在中国，绿色金融的支持范围随着国家对绿色金融目录的更新而持续调整。最新发布的《绿色金融支持项目目录（2025年版）》标志着绿色金融正朝着促进整个经济体系绿色转型的方向迈进。
• 中国、欧盟和美国在绿色金融政策体系上各具特色：欧盟强调法律先行、标准统一及强制信息披露要求，构建了全球范围内较为完善且具约束力的绿色金融监管与市场体系；中国的绿色金融政策体系主要依赖部门规章层级的政策性指导文件，这些文件的强制性弱于法律；而美国则更倾向于利用成熟的资本市场和强大的市场驱动力，但由于联邦层面缺乏一贯性和长期稳定性，导致整体政策连续性较弱。
• 国际主要绿色标准对比显示，欧盟在技术指标设定与评估流程设计上具有更高的规范性与精细化程度，相比之下，中国的绿色标准体系主要采用“正面清单”模式，旨在提升政策可操作性以扩大绿色金融市场，但在技术细节等方面不如欧盟标准详尽。国际通行标准则注重原则导向与灵活性，为不同司法管辖区的制度适配提供较大空间。
• 中国绿色金融政策体系在深化过程中仍面临多重挑战：与国际标准的一致性不足、ESG信息披露的强制性和覆盖面不足，以及现行机制偏向追求短期规模扩张而非长期绿色项目的效益评估。

• 预计2025年全国商品房销售压力仍存。高线城市继续支撑市场，但结构上仍面临二手房分流、库存分化明显的矛盾。稳住楼市仍有赖于政策的持续发力，城中村改造货币化安置及回储政策或将是政策发力的重点。
• 受益于债务置换及专项债券用途扩展，城投企业流动性压力缓解，短期内出现债券信用风险事件的概率较低，但基本面难以显著改善。长期关注中央债务化解新增政策和城投转型成效。
• 与房地产行业紧密相关联的钢铁和建筑工程施工行业将基本延续需求疲软趋势。其中钢铁行业“反内卷”和成本回落或有助于利润修复，但财务杠杆仍将维持高位；建筑工程施工行业利润率将在低位保持稳定。
• 火电、风电设备和光伏制造行业的企业盈利能力或将改善，煤炭、清洁能源发电、整车制造以及商业物业持有及运营行业的企业利润率或将有所下降，杠杆率将有所上升。
• 商业银行净息差继续收窄，信用成本依然承压，行业总体盈利性较2024年会有小幅下降，但信用质量仍然能保持稳定，未来12个月高风险银行违约风险可控。

• 财政部年内两次通报隐性债务问责案例，反映出地方化债形势依然严峻，中央政府监管依然 较为严格。
• 7月30日召开的中共中央政治局会议重申加强地方债务风险防控，明确“有力有序有效推进 地方融资平台出清”。我们认为，政策意在剥离城投企业的政府融资职能，而非否定其主体 价值；未来，城投公司仍可通过市场化转型继续实现发展。
• 近年来，中央政府采取力度空前的政策措施，全力支持地方政府化解隐性债务，但今年审计 署披露的违规举债情况表明，部分地区在化解隐性债务方面仍需改进和加强。在此背景下， 中央持续释放对违规融资“零容忍”的强烈信号，以防范地方政府可能出现的道德风险。