20210705_rating-action_bscomc-sur_en SPG Ratings China /en/ratings/article/20210705_rating-action_bscomc-sur_en.cshtml content esgSubNav
In This List

Rating Action: Beijing State-Owned Capital Operation and Management Center “AAAspc” Rating Affirmed, With Stable Outlook

标普信评关于关注青岛华通国有资本投资运营集团有限公司监事变动以及重大资产出售的公告

高能级城市支撑“小阳春”,楼市结构分化加剧

关税阴霾下中国九大制造业之“变局”

Credit FAQ: The Contraction of China's Private Credit Market


Rating Action: Beijing State-Owned Capital Operation and Management Center “AAAspc” Rating Affirmed, With Stable Outlook

BEIJING,July 5, 2021 -- S&P Global (China) Ratings has affirmed its “AAAspc” issuer credit rating on Beijing State-Owned Capital Operation and Management Center (“BSCOMC”),the outlook is stable.

 

BSCOMC was established in 2008 and is wholly owned by the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of People’s Government of Beijing Municipality (Beijing SASAC). BSCOMC’s executive management committee (“Management Committee”) is made up of high-level officials from Beijing SASAC. Playing a strategic role on behalf of the Beijing municipal government, BSCOMC aims to promote the orderly allocation of state-owned capital and achieve capital appreciation of state-owned assets. BSCOMC has equity stakes in high-quality, competitive Beijing SOEs and is an important state-owned capital operation platform under Beijing SASAC.

 

In our view, the issuer credit rating of “AAAspc” reflects BSCOMC’s critical importance to Beijing municipal government and its substantial investment portfolio, which has good asset credit quality and good diversification across various industries and regions. We view BSCOMC’s financial risk profile as modest. BSCOMC has a low loan-to-value ratio, strong cash flow adequacy ratio and a good capital structure. We expect BSCOMC to maintain good access to refinancing in the future.

 

We view the indicative support capacity of Beijing municipal government as extremely strong, and regard BSCOMC as critical to its government. BSCOMC has very close ties with Beijing municipal government in terms of its equity structure and decision-making process, and we believe it plays a very important role on the government’s behalf. Major investment decisions require the Beijing municipal government’s approval. Since its establishment, BSCOMC has received ongoing support from Beijing municipal government via equity transfers, capital injections and other aspects. We do not anticipate any changes to the strategic role BSCOMC plays on behalf of the Beijing municipal government.

 

By the end of December 2020, BSCOMC had over RMB 3.1 trillion in assets under management, accounting for more than half of the assets under Beijing SASAC. On behalf of the Beijing municipal government, BSCOMC carries out its capital operations mainly through equity investments and fund investments.

 

In our opinion, BSCOMC’s investment portfolio has good indicative asset credit quality. BSCOMC has equity stakes in several high-quality SOEs in Beijing which are competitive players in their respective industries. We believe that the indicative credit quality of the main investee companies in the portfolio is relatively good and overall better than the national average.

 

BSCOMC’s portfolio is, in our view, well diversified. Its investee companies are spread across a wide range of industries and geographic regions. The portfolio covers more than 10 industries dispersed across upstream and downstream sectors. Major industries in the portfolio include: metals and mining downstream, unregulated power and gas, transportation infrastructure, Auto OEM, building materials, agribusiness and commodity foods, real estate developer, technology hardware and semiconductors, etc.A considerable portion of companies in the investment portfolio transitioned from regional Beijing-based SOEs to large-scale players with operations across the country, developing good reputations nationwide.

 

In our view, BSCOMC’s large investment portfolio and relatively light parent-level debt can help it maintain its LTV ratio at a relatively low level. We expect some of BSCOMC’s investments to be debt-funded, while its abundant cash reserves can also cover other investment demand. Overall debt is expected to rise slightly.  In our view, BSCOMC will maintain its prudent financial policy and keep its LTV ratio at a low level in the coming year.  We expect BSCOMC’s adjusted cash dividends and interest income to cover its interest and daily operating expenses, with cash adequacy ratio at a sufficient level.

 

The stable outlook on BSCOMC reflects our view that BSCOMC is critical to the Beijing municipal government, and that the indicative support capacity of Beijing municipal government remains extremely strong. As Beijing’s primary state-owned capital operation platform, we do not expect the strategic role BSCOMC plays on behalf of Beijing municipal government to change, wherein it promotes the orderly allocation of state-owned capital and achieves capital appreciation of state-owned assets. The scale of BSCOMC’s investment portfolio is expected to remain stable and asset credit quality is set to maintain a good level, with BSCOMC’s investments widely distributed across various industries. We expect BSCOMC to continue adhering to its prudent financial policy while maintaining a low LTV ratio.

 

Downside scenario:

In our opinion, the likelihood of BSCOMC’s issuer credit rating being downgraded is very low. However, we might consider lowering the rating of BSCOMC in the following circumstances:

 

1) BSCOMC’s role and status change significantly, weakening its importance to the Beijing municipal government. This scenario could occur if i) the ownership structure changes, and Beijing SASAC no longer has direct control over BSCOMC; ii) the management and decision-making process changes significantly, weakening the control of Beijing government over the appointment of BSCOMC’s Management Committee and limiting their control over its investment decisions; iii) a significant proportion of BSCOMC’s assets are transferred out of its portfolio, significantly impacting its role in managing state-owned assets.

 

2) Beijing's indicative support capacity weakens significantly.

Upside scenario: not applicable

 

Related Methodologies:

S&P Global (China) Ratings-Corporate Methodology, July 28, 2020

S&P Global (China) Ratings General Considerations on Rating Modifiers and Relative Ranking, May 21, 2019

 

Related Research:

Understanding S&P Global (China) Ratings Corporate Methodology, July 28, 2020

Commentary: Understanding S&P Global (China) Ratings General Considerations On Rating Modifiers and Relative Ranking Methodology, June 29, 2020

Commentary: Analyzing Investment Holding Companies’ Credit Quality With S&P Global (China) Ratings’ Corporate Methodology, March 1, 2021

 

Media Contacts:

Sharon.Tang,Beijing;(86)10-6569-2988;sharon.tang@spgchinaratings.cn

 

Analyst Contacts:

Huang Wang, Beijing; huang.wang@spgchinaratings.cn

Renyuan Zhang,Beijing; renyuan.zhang@spgchinaratings.cn

Yingxue Ren, Beijing; yingxue.ren@spgchinaratings.cn

 



标普信评关于关注青岛华通国有资本投资运营集团有限公司监事变动以及重大资产出售的公告

2025年3月27日,青岛华通国有资本投资运营集团有限公司(以下简称“青岛华通”或“公司”)变更监事信息,孔凡昌、丁唯颖不再担任公司监事。 
标普信评认为,此次监事变动属于国企正常的治理机制简化,不影响青岛华通的主体信用质量。 

点击下方按钮获取完整版报告。
<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>


高能级城市支撑“小阳春”,楼市结构分化加剧

3月楼市迎来“小阳春”行情,行业结构性分化加剧。总体来看,1-3月全国商品房销售额和销售面积累计同比分别下降2.1%和3.0%,降幅较1-2月分别收窄0.5和2.1个百分点。70个大中城市房价指数显示,各线城市房价均有不同程度回暖,新房和二手房价格环比上涨城市数量分别增至24个和10个,较上月增加6个和7个。结构分化主要体现在三方面:

  • 城市间K形分化特征愈发凸显,高能级城市独撑“回稳”大局。
  • 二手房交易热度强于新房,新房价格回暖主要由改善盘入市支撑。
  • 房企销售表现持续分化,国有与非国有阵营差距进一步拉大。
<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>


关税阴霾下中国九大制造业之“变局”

  • 我们认为,极端关税将对企业投资和家庭消费行为产生非线性影响,即使中国经济对美出口依赖已有所降低,但其对消费、投资带来的间接效应仍将非常广泛。
  • 我们认为,纺织业、消费电子及汽车零配件行业对美国市场依赖度高、产能可替代性较强、且中小企业占比较大,所受到的冲击将更为显著。
  • 我们认为需密切关注中小企业的信用质量变化,特别是在纺织、消费电子、家电和汽车零配件等中小企业密集的行业。这些企业的信用质量可能因其客户地域多元化、产业链灵活性及财务抗风险能力不足而更加脆弱。

欢迎点击下方按钮获取完整版报告。

<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>


Credit FAQ: The Contraction of China's Private Credit Market

  • China's private credit market has significant structural differences from those in the U.S. and Europe. It lacks alternative investment funds and direct lending, is heavily regulated, and banks remain key players.
  • We estimate the China market has shrunk to RMB21 trillion as of Dec. 31, 2024, nearly half its size since 2017. The decline comes on the back of new regulations, increased competition from local bond markets, and compressed margins.
  • A combination of softening demand and disruption in supply from lenders will likely lead the overall size of the private market to further contract.

Click below to read full report
<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>