20201020_rating-action_citibank_en SPG Ratings China /en/ratings/article/20201020_rating-action_citibank_en content esgSubNav
In This List

Rating Action: Citibank (China) Company Limited Assigned “AAAspc” Rating; Outlook Stable

标普信评关于关注青岛华通国有资本投资运营集团有限公司监事变动以及重大资产出售的公告

高能级城市支撑“小阳春”,楼市结构分化加剧

关税阴霾下中国九大制造业之“变局”

Credit FAQ: The Contraction of China's Private Credit Market


Rating Action: Citibank (China) Company Limited Assigned “AAAspc” Rating; Outlook Stable

BEIJING, October 20, 2020 - S&P Global (China) Ratings today assigned its “AAAspc” issuer credit rating (“ICR”) to Citibank (China) Company Limited (“Citibank (China)”).The Outlook is stable.
We assess Citibank (China)’s stand-alone credit profile (“SACP”) as “aaspc-”, four notches higher than the “bbb+” anchor we typically apply to a commercial bank in China. This SACP reflects its very strong capital base, good asset quality and superior funding and liquidity profile. we assign an ICR of “AAAspc” to Citibank (China), three notches higher than its SACP of “aaspc-” to reflect the extremely high likelihood of support from its parent bank. Citibank (China), a fully owned subsidiary of Citibank N.A., is an integral part of the global banking network of Citigroup Inc.(“Citi”).
Citibank (China) has a very strong capitalization base, with capital adequacy ratios much higher than the industry average in China. Its profitability is also good mainly due to its low deposit cost, which has led to a healthy NIM. As of the end of 2019, its tier-1 capital adequacy ratio was 19.42%, 7.47 percentage points higher than the industry average of 11.95% and 10.92 percentage points higher than the minimum regulatory requirement of 8.5%.We believe COVID-19 won’t have any significant negative impact on its strong capitalization given its effective risk control.
Citibank (China) takes a prudent approach to risk management. It targets a client base of multinationals, large and mid-sized Chinese enterprises with international business and mid-to-high end retail customers. We believe this target client base has maintained good credit quality despite the pandemic. Citibank (China) had a non-performing loan (“NPL”) ratio of 0.47% as of the end of 2019, much lower than the industry average of 1.86%.
Its funding stability is better than the industry average due to its sticky and stable deposit base, which is built on its strong treasury and trade finance business. It has limited use of wholesale funding because its lending business can be comfortably funded by its deposits. As of the end of 2019, 89% of its total liabilities were customer deposits, and only 6% were wholesale funding. Its asset liquidity profile is also better than the industry average due to its large holding of treasury bonds.
Citibank (China)’s business strength can be attributed to the competitive advantages of its parent. Citi serves clients in more than 160 countries. This superior global network makes it capable of offering clients global-level treasury and trade solutions which are also offered to Citibank (China) clients.
Compared to domestic banks where business growth is mainly driven by lending, Citibank (China) focuses more on promoting cross-selling activities through its group’s global network. As a result, its loan book is relatively small compared to mainstream domestic banks. As of the end of 2019, its gross loan was 66.58 billion RMB, with a national market share of 0.05%.
S&P Global Ratings has assigned an SACP of “a-” and an issuer credit rating of “A+” to Citibank N.A.. Based on the broad relationship observed between the ratings of S&P Global Ratings and S&P Global (China) Ratings, S&P Global (China) Ratings views the issuer credit quality of Citibank N. A. as extremely strong, equivalent to the issuer credit rating of “AAAspc” on our national scale. We believe that Citibank (China) is of critical importance to its parent and its ratings are closely aligned with the issuer credit quality of Citibank N.A. 
Rating Score Snapshot 
Anchor: bbb+ 
Business Position: 0
Capital and Earnings: +2 
Risk Position: +1
Funding and Liquidity: +1
Stand-alone Credit Profile: aaspc-
Group Support: +3
Issuer Credit Rating: AAAspc
Outlook: Stable 
Related Methodologies and Research: 
S&P Global (China) Ratings Financial Institutions Methodology, January 31, 2019;
Small but Solid – Foreign Bank Subsidiaries as Niche Players in China’s Banking Sector, February 26, 2020.
Media Contacts:
Sharon Tang, Beijing, (86) 10-6569-2988; sharon.tang@spglobal.com
Analyst Contacts:
Longtai Chen, Beijing; longtai.chen@spgchinaratings.cn
Zheng Li, Beijing; zheng.li@spgchinaratings.cn
Xuefei Zou, CPA, Beijing; eric.zou@spgchinaratings.cn

 



标普信评关于关注青岛华通国有资本投资运营集团有限公司监事变动以及重大资产出售的公告

2025年3月27日,青岛华通国有资本投资运营集团有限公司(以下简称“青岛华通”或“公司”)变更监事信息,孔凡昌、丁唯颖不再担任公司监事。 
标普信评认为,此次监事变动属于国企正常的治理机制简化,不影响青岛华通的主体信用质量。 

点击下方按钮获取完整版报告。
<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>


高能级城市支撑“小阳春”,楼市结构分化加剧

3月楼市迎来“小阳春”行情,行业结构性分化加剧。总体来看,1-3月全国商品房销售额和销售面积累计同比分别下降2.1%和3.0%,降幅较1-2月分别收窄0.5和2.1个百分点。70个大中城市房价指数显示,各线城市房价均有不同程度回暖,新房和二手房价格环比上涨城市数量分别增至24个和10个,较上月增加6个和7个。结构分化主要体现在三方面:

  • 城市间K形分化特征愈发凸显,高能级城市独撑“回稳”大局。
  • 二手房交易热度强于新房,新房价格回暖主要由改善盘入市支撑。
  • 房企销售表现持续分化,国有与非国有阵营差距进一步拉大。
<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>


关税阴霾下中国九大制造业之“变局”

  • 我们认为,极端关税将对企业投资和家庭消费行为产生非线性影响,即使中国经济对美出口依赖已有所降低,但其对消费、投资带来的间接效应仍将非常广泛。
  • 我们认为,纺织业、消费电子及汽车零配件行业对美国市场依赖度高、产能可替代性较强、且中小企业占比较大,所受到的冲击将更为显著。
  • 我们认为需密切关注中小企业的信用质量变化,特别是在纺织、消费电子、家电和汽车零配件等中小企业密集的行业。这些企业的信用质量可能因其客户地域多元化、产业链灵活性及财务抗风险能力不足而更加脆弱。

欢迎点击下方按钮获取完整版报告。

<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>


Credit FAQ: The Contraction of China's Private Credit Market

  • China's private credit market has significant structural differences from those in the U.S. and Europe. It lacks alternative investment funds and direct lending, is heavily regulated, and banks remain key players.
  • We estimate the China market has shrunk to RMB21 trillion as of Dec. 31, 2024, nearly half its size since 2017. The decline comes on the back of new regulations, increased competition from local bond markets, and compressed margins.
  • A combination of softening demand and disruption in supply from lenders will likely lead the overall size of the private market to further contract.

Click below to read full report
<%@ Register TagPrefix="uc" TagName="GatedContent" Src="~/UserControls/Ratings/GatedContent.ascx" %>